Are You Guility of Breaking The Law, of Cyber Bullying or Other Offences Due to Postings Lies, Untruths and Vicious or defamatory comments on the internet about others? – The Truth About Jonathan Royle aka Alex Smith

Are You Guility of Breaking The Law, of Cyber Bullying or Other Offences Due to Postings Lies, Untruths and Vicious or defamatory comments on the internet about others?

If this link has been posted on a thread or in a forum etc, or sent to you by email, it will have been done in order to illustrate that you (or someone involved in that thread for example) are Guilty of one or more of the Legal Offences mentioned below..

Some are of a Civil Nature and thus can lead to Financial damages and compensation being awarded by the Courts which when the person is found guilty will have to be paid to the innocent party and others would lead to Police Involvement
And in some cases potentially a custodial sentence for the guilty party.

Firstly here is the proof that comments that have been posted about me by certain individuals (no doubt where this link has been posted) are 100% Untrue and therefore is also proof that they are guilty, of one, more or perhaps even all of the offences details of which then follow..


(And thus they are guilty or Several, perhaps even ALL of the offences mentioned above)

And also more in-depth insights are in this video –

There are two options involving the Police that are open to those who are victims of such lies being posted on places such as Facebook Groups and forums etc and these are the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and also the Malicious Communications Act 1988.

Both of these can potentially lead to imprisonment for the guilty party as illustrated at the links which follow, or at very least to an official Police Caution which would show up on any Enhanced CRB Check, which all entertainers (especially those who may make contact with Children or vulnerable people are advised to have) thus being found guilty of such can have serious consequences indeed.

Prohibition of Harassment

Prohibition of harassment.

(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and
(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

(2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.

Offence of harassment.

(1)A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 is guilty of an offence.

(2)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both.

Putting people in fear of violence –

4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or

(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.

(5)If on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence under this section the jury find him not guilty of the offence charged, they may find him guilty of an offence under section 2.

Malicious Communications Act 1988

And also there are Civil Legal Issues that people who post such lies and rubbish on the internet should consider such as:

Defamation of Character

While it has no single definition, defamation involves making a statement which is likely to lower other people’s opinions of an individual or group of people. There are limitations on who can claim for defamation, because the statement has to be specific enough that it is likely to cause harm to their reputation; simple abuse does not count as being defamatory.

Defamation takes two forms – libel and slander. Slander is generally used to refer to defamation through speech, whereas libel involves a lasting publication of the defamatory comments.

Remedies for defamation vary, but, as with all punishments for crime, attempt to go some way towards alleviating the anguish caused to the victim. They may involve a fine payable to the affected person or an official retraction in the publication in question.

There are, of course, various defences of defamation which can be used if legal action should be taken. It is not always the case that saying something negative about an individual is illegal; in fact, if it can be proven that the statement was the truth, this is sufficient defence. The rule of fair comment also allows justifiable opinions to be stated, even negative ones.


(And thus they are guilty or Several, perhaps even ALL of the offences mentioned above)

And also more in-depth insights are in this video

They Should also consider Copyright Law..

As to take someone’s Copyrighted materials (such as videos) and then to without permission edit lots of clips together to make a video which implies that someone has hurt somebody else and is edited to portray the victim in a negative manner is both a breach of Various Laws stated above and also BREACH OF COPYRIGHT

A thorough examination of The Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988 would be wise for people to understand as then they would realise that doing such is Illegal and they are opening themselves up to legal repercussions for doing such both of a Civil Manner and in this example and context also of a Criminal Nature (eg due to other laws already mentioned) –

Also these Guilty Parties should realise that they are most always Guilty of CYBER BULLYING and that in that regard there are several legal remedies that can be used against them.

Some insights can be found at –

However, when this technology is abused, or used to harass or threaten others, there may be legal consequences.

There are four UK statute laws and one Scottish common law that are relevant to the use of IT in relation to bullying. These are:

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997

The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994

The Malicious Communications Act 1998

The Communications Act 2003

Breach of the Peace (common law)

How these Acts can be related to bullying, and specifically to cyber bullying, is outlined below. If the bullying is based on sexual, racial or religious grounds, prosecution could be sought through anti-discriminatory laws.

Fuller details of how to use these laws to Protect yourself from internet bullies are given at:

Its also important to consider that where there are Moderators on a Forum or Group for example, once said Moderators have been notified that something posted about another is Defamation of Character and/or Cyber Bullying and/or an offence under any of the other laws mentioned above, then they the Moderators have a legal duty to ensure that such comments are removed and that the guilty party is not allowed to do such again (common sense Shows the best solution for that is to ban them)

Also it should be noted that although comments can be deleted from forums etc, places such as Facebook have to keep records for many years of what has been posted and such records upon request have to be released to the Police and Courts so just deleting something does not mean the guilty party suddenly becomes immune to having action taken against them for their inappropriate actions.

Indeed it would only ever help their defence if not only were the comments deleted, but then they also published a full Public apology admitting their Error and apologising making it clear that they are now aware of the truth.

I hope some of you find these links and information of use as I am sure you will, if like me, you find yourself the victim of vicious and immature individuals posting absolute rubbish about you on the internet.

Finally as I understand the link has broken on one of the pages I have referred to here is a link to read my autobiography (ages 0 to 30) online for free –

You can buy the Amazon Kindle version here –

The contents of the above book which have an ISBN number and have been Copyrighted and on world sale since 2006 have been featured in The Sunday Times, Daily Mail and The Telegraph amongst other newspapers and various TV and Radio talk shows.

The journalists named are aware of their inclusion as are the newspapers I expose the antics of (mainly News of The World)  And none of them have ever been able to get the book removed from sale or able to take legal action against me as every word in the book is easily proven (along with Court Records where needed) to be totally true and provable as such.

If you want to know the REAL TRUTH behind the complete rubbish that people post about me (and also gain some interesting insights into the my lifetime career in showbiz) then have a read of the book.

Its full of names, dates, places, facts and easily checked out as 100% Genuine and True Evidence that show that what these nasty idiots post about me is complete and utter tosh.

REMEMBER I published this book (and it was featured in major publications) several years before The News of The World shut down due to the Phone Hacking Scandal.

Within the pages of my book I reveal even more of the often illegal techniques used by dodgy journalists to create UNTRUE totally fake and fabricated stories for their publications..

I mention actual Journalists names and give the evidence that they have been guilty of fabricating so called “news” for years, and yes all this evidence has been discussed in THE CROWN COURT as anyone who reads my book will discover.


You have been warned and for those who actually value the TRUTH, then all the links to all the evidence that illustrates what some vindictive idiots say about me is total rubbish are contained here on this page…